discussion on increasing amount of gpg signatures...

[Len Sassaman]

On Sun, 14 Oct 2001, David Shaw wrote:

> True.  I don't see that as a an OpenPGP issue so much though.  There
> is nothing stopping an implementation from taking the signature class
> into consideration when calculating trust.  You should be able to
> specify that you trust a key's signatures only if the sig class is
> "extensively checked".
>
> Or do you mean a literal "trust signature", a la the special
> subpacket?

Yep.