discussion on increasing amount of gpg signatures...

David Shaw dshaw@jabberwocky.com
Sun Oct 14 20:08:01 2001


--zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 10:54:17AM -0700, Len Sassaman wrote:

> On Sun, 14 Oct 2001, David Shaw wrote:
>=20
> > > Some people have "high-security" signing keys, which they use to sign
> > > keys belong to people of whose identity they are absolutely positive;=
"low
> > > security keys" they use to sign online acquaintences' keys; pseudonym
> > > signing keys, etc.
> >
> > Don't forget that OpenPGP lets people put this sort of information
> > into the signature itself. There are 4 levels of classification
> > ranging from "I'm not going to say", to "I checked this extensively".
>=20
> True; however, that function of OpenPGP isn't all that useful, in my
> opinion. One person's extensively is another person's casually,
Sure, I said this in my email. You snipped that bit :)
> though
> this isn't the biggest drawback. There isn't a way to set a trusted
> introducer that only introduces keys that have been checked "extensively".
> It's an all or nothing decision.
True. I don't see that as a an OpenPGP issue so much though. There is nothing stopping an implementation from taking the signature class into consideration when calculating trust. You should be able to specify that you trust a key's signatures only if the sig class is "extensively checked". Or do you mean a literal "trust signature", a la the special subpacket? David --=20 David Shaw | dshaw@jabberwocky.com | WWW http://www.jabberwocky.com/ +--------------------------------------------------------------------------= -+ "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson --zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iQEVAwUBO8nTt4ccwqs8s7QVAQG/3wf+JsoxhMYGhrDu00+Iwj3omjcZV+rH+EGH t47Z+ACmzswWvbY2ATt7pooiMiU1YupTR71f4sfAeSwUs39Gp7plg4F1s53okmPs 7/1cLtuw40O6RNKsODavzMWh5FL6cBmbXuO7qc9dAbMERruSWtPKM3CFZMnYRVg9 izYhdVV1z8wF2uLSnjiBZ70EUDRRk3RmTD7HHIEgZ99devYdZ06f2/C0BvuIMmPJ 6ONM5moFsvUVBfcPQeEXKDALZSixwPZhIchmXU1Hyv90FOSvkc3U0jwqEcaJ266P J589eX+MUjTrRdBUIRZxtjfpjFpDc1a6hFyWkEEjYdynzISOIaQeDQ== =Ek1S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA--