Quality of PRNGD

[Gordon Worley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Recently someone made me aware of PRNGD.  The Web site claims that it 
is better than EGD and gives reasons.  I was wondering if anyone else 
here had used it and the quality of the RNG (realizing, of course, 
this differs per system).  Anyway, thought I should ask since I 
haven't heard anything about it until today and thus wouldn't feel 
safe using it without some knowledge of peer review.

<http://ftp.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/postfix_tls/prngd.html>
- -- 
Gordon Worley                     `When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty
http://www.rbisland.cx/            said, `it means just what I choose
redbird@rbisland.cx                it to mean--neither more nor less.'
PGP:  0xBBD3B003                                  --Lewis Carroll

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
Comment: keyserver http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371

iQA/AwUBO5/LKG7zd/e707ADEQIoVwCgvmKvgBDhYyyvmtMgtNk6VLrEgSsAn3r7
aCxvb6t5FA4mEu7rEriX7gKX
=OSH3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----