signing + mailing lists

[Justin R. Miller]

--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thus spake Gordon Worley (redbird@rbisland.cx):

> But, from this message, I guess we can all see your opinion.  ;-)

Heh, well since I started using GPG regularly, I've been signing all
mail, unless the signature interferes with the message (i.e. a
subscription confirmation that can't have attachments, etc.)  But I'm
trying to gather some info to make a decision one way or the other, to
remain the same or to change, since I do want to be practical when it
comes to message sizes. =20

--=20
| Justin R. Miller / justin@solidlinux.com / 0xC9C40C31
| Of all the things I've lost, I miss my pants the most.
----------------------------------------------------------

--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7p9tu94d6K8nEDDERAka9AJ48e7UnfwETdPYhFeGcGepbWp8+fQCfWr4Q
2dOtSD7P4t2k+dXx0suRIdI=
=/pLe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--