Mutt/GnuPG doc initial release

[kevin lyda]

--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 12:00:40AM +0200, Ingo Kl=F6cker wrote:
> lists. As you are using mutt (at least that's what your X-Mailer header=
=20
> tells me) it's very likely that you are using procmail already to=20
> convert inlined signatures to PGP/MIME signatures. So why not simply=20
> remove signatures from mailing list messages.

actually if you use mutt+procmail it's best if you have procmail deliver
your mail into different folders based on mailing lists (i do it for
that and other things).  then use a folder hook to set various settings.
i use a folder hook to turn off auto signatures on mailing lists that
don't allow it.  one could also use a folder hook to turn off signature
checking, etc.

honestly, a mutt user should not complain about things like this.

kevin

--=20
kevin@suberic.net          "if you come from brooklyn you can handle just
fork()'ed on 37058400       about anything."  --nyc mayor, rudolph gulliani
meatspace place: home     =20
http://suberic.net/~kevin

--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7sliOSWViC/JcvFsRAovOAJ0bCHuFHkz8RH5CE7qOfOOV2l0HVQCdEa4z
fjUE//wnVEuFlbu5oG1xlLA=
=AKhy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5vNYLRcllDrimb99--