Mutt/GnuPG doc initial release

kevin lyda
Thu Sep 27 01:10:02 2001

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 12:00:40AM +0200, Ingo Kl=F6cker wrote:

> lists. As you are using mutt (at least that's what your X-Mailer header=
> tells me) it's very likely that you are using procmail already to=20
> convert inlined signatures to PGP/MIME signatures. So why not simply=20
> remove signatures from mailing list messages.
actually if you use mutt+procmail it's best if you have procmail deliver your mail into different folders based on mailing lists (i do it for that and other things). then use a folder hook to set various settings. i use a folder hook to turn off auto signatures on mailing lists that don't allow it. one could also use a folder hook to turn off signature checking, etc. honestly, a mutt user should not complain about things like this. kevin --=20 "if you come from brooklyn you can handle just fork()'ed on 37058400 about anything." --nyc mayor, rudolph gulliani meatspace place: home =20 --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see iD8DBQE7sliOSWViC/JcvFsRAovOAJ0bCHuFHkz8RH5CE7qOfOOV2l0HVQCdEa4z fjUE//wnVEuFlbu5oG1xlLA= =AKhy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99--