Keyservers (was: Re: Dumb Question)

[John Goerzen]

Unfortunately, I have run into trouble.  If you have multiple subkeys, esp.
with revokations on some, that server can mangle them beyond recognition.

On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:43:15PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Rodney D. Myers <rdmyers@netzon.net> wrote:
> > Is wwwkeys.pgp.net the best keyserver?
> > 
> > I know, best, is very subjective.
> 
> I've been using wwwkeys.pgp.net for a quite a while now, and so far
> haven't ran into trouble. Maybe couple of missing keys, but can't even
> remember when these things happened. So, IMHO: works well. I guess
> they all do, but I can't say anything about anything else than
> wwwkeys.pgp.net. :-)
> 
> - -- 
> Jussi Ekholm  --  <ekhowl@goa-head.org>  --  http://erppimaa.ihku.org/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE9Uq2yAtEARxQQCB4RArAlAJ9+cV3A3VLrlSc0GCWjV3v2IodHMQCfWCLV
> o1fs/+O5Nc/gwv05GYAPYoE=
> =r8Mz
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

-- 
John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>    GPG: 0x8A1D9A1F    www.complete.org