Bad signature (was: Re: GPG support in Mahogany)

Dave Barton
Wed Dec 11 03:03:01 2002

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 11:28, Ingo Kl=F6cker wrote:
> Hi!
> On Tuesday 10 December 2002 20:49, Toxik - Fabian Rodriguez wrote:
> [Message was signed by Fabian Rodriguez (Key ID: 0x5AF2A4D5).]
> [Warning: The signature is bad.]
> > > We are beginning to provide support for PGP operations in
> > > Mahogany[1],
> >
> > You mean OpenPGP of course... or GnuPG... ;)
> [snip]
> [End of signed message]
> Am I the only one who gets bad signature warnings for a lot of messages=20
> Toxik sends? I don't get bad signatures for any other people signing=20
> messages on this list so I'm pretty sure that the problem isn't on my=20
> side (even more so because poor Toxik has to use Microsoft Outlook).=20
> But to be 100% sure I thought I'd ask.
> Regards,
> Ingo

No you are not the only one.I got a bad signature warning for Toxik's

For your message I got:
gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
gpg: Signature made Wed 11 Dec 2002 11:29:02 AM EST using DSA key ID 30E0B9=
gpg: BAD signature from "Ingo Kl=F6cker <>"

Registered Linux User #288562

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)