Bad signature (was: Re: GPG support in Mahogany)
Sat Dec 14 12:44:02 2002
Content-Description: signed data
On Saturday 14 December 2002 11:18, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder=20
> On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 01:47, Ingo Kl=F6cker wrote:
> > BTW, this message was created after applying a fix to KMail (now
> > KMail encodes trailing spaces correctly). Is the signature now
> > valid, Dave?
> Forgive me for not being Dave :-)
No problem. ;-)
> Ok with Evolution 1.2, as was your message on the Mahogany thread.
Hmm, now I'm confused. On Thursday 12 December 2002 10:07, you wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 03:48, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> > I just checked Ingo's signature, and it checks good.
> This is sylpheed, right?
> I also consistently can't verify Ingo's signatures. This is evolution
So was this a typo and you wanted to write "can" instead of "can't"?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----