Bad signature (was: Re: GPG support in Mahogany)
Sun Dec 15 04:33:02 2002
On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 05:53, Ingo Kl=C3=B6cker wrote:
> > I also consistently can't verify Ingo's signatures. This is evolution
> > 1.2
> So was this a typo and you wanted to write "can" instead of "can't"?
I have no problems verifying your signature with Evolution 1.2, Ingo. I
do have problems with Evolution 1.2 and inline signatures,=20
What I don't like about the latest version of Evolution is that it will
not automatically detect encrypted messages unless they were sent with
another PGP/MIME MTU. Upon receiving encrypted messages, I have to save
the mail as a file and manually decrypt from the command line (I'm using
Linux Redhat 8.0).
The previous version of Evolution did not seem to have this problem.=20
*sigh*... I'm going to have to seriously consider switching to something
else - Evolution just seems to have issues with signatures and
decryption, which is unfortunate.
Ian Scott <firstname.lastname@example.org>