Interesting...

Anthony E. Greene agreene@pobox.com
Fri Jul 12 20:24:01 2002


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12-Jul-2002/17:29 +0200, Florian Weimer <Weimer@CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE> wrote:
>"Adam Pavelec" <apavelec@benefit-services.com> writes:
>
>> Here's a rather interesting article: 
>> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,368778,00.asp
>>
>> I am glad GnuPG is open to review by our community to aviod
>> these issues.
>
>GnuPG has had a similar problem. :-/

Which is exactly why I pointed out that if GnuPG has a better chance of
avoiding these problems, it is not because the source is open, but because
GnuPG was designed using the "do one thing well" UNIX philosophy.

Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene <mailto:agreene@pobox.com>
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Chat: TonyG05      HomePage: <http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/>
Linux: the choice of a GNU Generation. <http://www.linux.org/>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene 0x6C94239D <agreene@pobox.com>

iD8DBQE9Lx8SpCpg3WyUI50RAphWAJ9ab/Giey/2zaL3caMYzhqyyDj5kACgqWX2
5pMJM+Jt2WI07qw5erk804I=
=B81R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----