bad signatures

Lee Roberts n0sq@arrl.net
Wed Mar 27 06:07:02 2002


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I could've sworn that I uploaded the keys to the server. Anyway, the keys=
 were submitted to pgp.mit.edu. Key ID 0x54C7CC50 is revoked, though.

On Monday 25 March 2002 10:35 pm, Nick Andriash wrote:
> Hello Lee Roberts,
>
> On Monday, March 25 2002 at 08:01 PM PDT, you wrote:
> > Why does everyone say my GPG signature is bad while their PGP signatu=
re
> > shows good? I did a decrypt/verify of one of my GPG messages with PGP
> > and it gives a bad signature also. So far, I don't see anything wrong
> > with my GPG configuration.
>
> Poor wrapping by the Mail Client, i.e. wrapping of text after the messa=
ge
> has been signed is one of the most probable causes, unless you use a
> WYSIWYG Editor. Also, I see this in your headers:
>
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> I'm not sure if I'm using the correct vernacular, but some Servers will=
 be
> cause for concern if they convert the text to 7 bit. I could not check
> your signature because I could not find your Key on any of the Servers.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Encryption isn't just for secrets......

iEYEARECAAYFAjyhUv0ACgkQUdYCmRtxtWSlXACgiMelDvNwMX5Xbf2bvFcJgWCu
/5YAoKslJ6C+7zHb8VCs0q1oew239yq/
=3Do9pX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----