Re: nonsubscriber posts
Tue May 14 13:56:01 2002
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Adrian, et al --
=2E..and then Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder said...
% On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 11:30, Lars Hecking wrote:
% > > Subject: non-member submission
% > =20
% > I am strictly against any subject-mangling, no matter for what reasons.
% This list seems to be managed with mailman. irrc the standard behaviour
% is that the admin gets a mail saying something like 'administrative
% request(s) waiting' and the msg in question attached. If the admin
% approves the message, the *original* message (still queued in the
% mailman system) is forwarded to the list, so the msg on the list is
% unchanged. If I understand the discussion right, it's all only about how
% the admin gets the notification of pending msgs.
Right. THIS IS ALL ABOUT MODERATOR MAIL. I am so sorry that I failed to
make the initial distinction clearly. I am hopeful that this thread can
die and Werner and Frank (and anyone else who can help out) can get
together and set up moderation without any more chatter from us :-)
% -- vbi
% I sign e-mail using OpenPGP (rfc2440) compliant software.
HTH & HAND
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) email@example.com * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----