GPG problem Urgent please

Brian V Bonini b-bonini at cox.net
Mon Dec 22 13:13:53 CET 2003


On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 11:23, john stephenson wrote:
> Some of us receive data on a regular basis for automatic processing 
> that the sender requires be encrypted! Automating the process makes 
> sense to me. I don't agree that 'you essentially render the security 
> useless' as we perform our decryption in a secure environment!
> 

But assuming your secure environment became compromised now all one has
to do is run your automated decryption routines. That's all I was
thinking.


-- 
Brian
GnuPG // KeyID: 0x04A4F0DC | Key Server: pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint = 9A80 8714 A9C8 F26A 2928  CF3C 2C35 0110 04A4 F0DC
______________________________________________________________________
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 04A4F0DC
GnuPG: http://gnupg.org
http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x2C35011004A4F0DC
Linux Registered User #339825 at http://counter.li.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20031222/887c47ca/attachment.bin


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list