can`t verify signature

David Shaw dshaw@jabberwocky.com
Sun Jul 27 03:07:01 2003


--0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 09:23:20AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> On 26-Jul-2003, David Shaw wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 07:31:54PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > > A key should be bound to an individual, not multiple persons.
> >=20
> > There is no requirement in OpenPGP that this is true.  (Well, there is
> > no trust model in OpenPGP, but that's another story).
>=20
> Which makes sense, since we were discussing trust models ("would you
> sign this key?") and nobody mentioned OpenPGP.

Ok, forget OpenPGP.  It isn't true in GnuPG or PGP either.

Any given signer can of course choose to certify however they like,
but both programs allow for multiple-owner keys, and in fact have
numerous features to make using multiple-owner keys easier.

David

--0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.3-cvs (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Key available at http://www.jabberwocky.com/david/keys.asc

iHEEARECADEFAj8jJecqGGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuamFiYmVyd29ja3kuY29tL2Rhdmlk
L2tleXMuYXNjAAoJEOJmXIdJ4cvJvH0AoJLHiIhwDtUT6L4NNchJrWInc6e9AJ4r
q9CWvQOvxP6Ho6CIBB0E3zXSrw==
=9tIr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3--