Email Clients and digital signatures
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
avbidder@fortytwo.ch
Mon Jun 30 08:17:02 2003
--Boundary-02=_CZ9/+z0fiFObN7c
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline
On Saturday 28 June 2003 13:21, Subba Rao wrote:
> out there now. Outlook stands out the best, since you can have calender
> and tasks list etc.
(1) Outlook is *bad*: you probably have to go to extra lengths to see this=
=20
message, since it's a PGP/MIME message. This particular bug is about 4 or=20
more years old and M$ declined to fix it for whatever reasons.
(2) having TODO list and a calendar application is related to being a good=
=20
*mail* client exactly how? I mean, if you think Outlook is a good mail=20
client, then please argue with its features as a mail client and not with a=
ll=20
the other things it might have.
Not going into the more ideological debate that one should avoid products o=
f a=20
company that aggressively tries to maintain and extend its monopoly, and th=
at=20
demands horrendously high prices for its software... (You *did* pay for you=
r=20
Windows and Office software, didn't you?)
cheers
=2D- vbi
=2D-=20
NOTE: my email addresses in usenet postings change frequently!
--Boundary-02=_CZ9/+z0fiFObN7c
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iKcEABECAGcFAj7/1kJgGmh0dHA6Ly9mb3J0eXR3by5jaC9sZWdhbC9ncGcvZW1h
aWwuMjAwMjA4MjI/dmVyc2lvbj0xLjUmbWQ1c3VtPTVkZmY4NjhkMTE4NDMyNzYw
NzFiMjVlYjcwMDZkYTNlAAoJEIukMYvlp/fW45cAnj2xAkDN7HLVVo9eBYCQgyPT
ENtUAJ4h7QQBOooDSM7REdFj/T2K3HSBPg==
=yZMp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Signature policy: http://fortytwo.ch/legal/gpg/email.20020822?version=1.5&md5sum=5dff868d11843276071b25eb7006da3e
--Boundary-02=_CZ9/+z0fiFObN7c--