Mutt and GnuPG
Stewart V. Wright
svwright+lists at amtp.liv.ac.uk
Wed Nov 12 21:41:31 CET 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
A couple of thoughts...
* Ash Varma <tnedor at yahoo.com> [031112 21:23]:
> > >I get "^M" (without the ""'s) in mutt if i decode any messages in mutt
> > >that use inline sigs.
That does sounds like a windows problem. However you said you're
running on GNU/Linux. Is your mail server modifying messages
somewhere along the line? Does this message have the ^M's???
> Does not matter who it comes from.. Usually, if the message has inline
> sigs, it gives me this problem... your message was decoded correctly.
"Usually"? Is this not a consistent problem? Also Thorsten's
messaage wasn't signed as inline so it shouldn't cause problems...
> My mutt information is listed below.
Checked against my various mutt versions and the only differences are
> -HOMESPOOL +USE_SETGID +USE_DOTLOCK +DL_STANDALONE
But I can't see that this would make a difference (not that I have any
idea what DL_STANDALONE actually is!)
My suggestions (if my message comes up with the ^M's) are to :
1) Send yourself an inlined signed message and see if you are getting
the ^M problem, then send yourself a signed message from another
external (i.e. Yahoo) acct and see if your MTA is messing with the
messages in transit.
2) Take this question to the mutt list (www.mutt.org)
3) Set up your mutt properly so that Mail-Followup-To doesn't include
you... You get this message on the list, so you don't need it
Hope this helps,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users