Mutt and GnuPG

Thorsten Haude linux at
Sat Nov 15 00:15:02 CET 2003


* Adrian von Bidder <avbidder at> [2003-11-13 09:23]:
>On Wednesday 12 November 2003 23:06, Thorsten Haude wrote:
>> * Stewart V. Wright <svwright+lists at> [2003-11-12 22:41]:
>> >Also Thorsten's messaage wasn't signed as inline so it shouldn't
>> >cause problems...
>> Uh... it wasn't? What is inline then?
>This is an inline signed message: The Content-Type is text/plain, as for a 
>normal, unsigned message, and the signed message is just inserted in the body 
>of the mail.

Ok, thanks for clearing that up. I hope I'm not confused the next time
I want to explain something.

A witty saying proves nothing.
    - Voltair
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20031115/8b0cb899/attachment-0001.bin

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list