Outlook express messes up when it receives gpg-signed mail?
Thomas White
taw27@cam.ac.uk
Sun Sep 14 20:25:01 2003
--=.ATrEbyFnTbXseW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:37:18 +0100, Thomas White said:
>
> > I notice that Sylpheed does not declare the overall
> > "multipart/signed" component as "inline", only the "text/plain"
> > part. Is this incorrect behaviour? Does this cause any problems
> > that would not have existed had
>
> Yes, becuase it can't know whether the next part is actually suitable
> for inlining:
I've written a (trivial) patch which adds this header for Sylpheed.
It's posted to the Sylpheed mailing list and I'll forward it to anyone
interested.
I also notice that KMail (1.5) doesn't appear to generate the inline
header. Should that be fixed too?
Is it required that the Content-Disposition header immediately follows
the Content-Type header? At least one of my mailing lists seems to be
rearranging these headers.
Thanks,
Tom
--
Thomas White
Downing College
Cambridge
GPG: D8834197
9749 7C8A 037D F867 9F38 F7C0 2314 8F97 D883 4197
--=.ATrEbyFnTbXseW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/ZLLeIxSPl9iDQZcRAi+FAKCG2UjKj4nX/ATPXul+0r0v3Im3EQCfSbPx
c9Wy22FUh/eWAVrqs8LtNSU=
=QFAU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=.ATrEbyFnTbXseW--