gpg: can't put a policy URL into v3 (PGP 2.x style) signature
dshaw at jabberwocky.com
Fri Apr 9 20:26:39 CEST 2004
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 12:01:58PM -0400, Atom 'Smasher' wrote:
> > It's not a question of prohibition. It's a question of
> > impossibility. V3 signatures have no subpackets - there is no place
> > to put the policy URL.
> i guess i never realized that clearsigning was a v3-only animal. is that
> something that might warrant an update in a pending draft rfc?
Huh? Clearsigning is not a v3 only thing.
More information about the Gnupg-users