gpg: can't put a policy URL into v3 (PGP 2.x style) signature
Atom 'Smasher'
atom-gpg at suspicious.org
Fri Apr 9 20:35:40 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> > > It's not a question of prohibition. It's a question of
> > > impossibility. V3 signatures have no subpackets - there is no place
> > > to put the policy URL.
> > ===============================
> >
> > i guess i never realized that clearsigning was a v3-only animal. is that
> > something that might warrant an update in a pending draft rfc?
>
> Huh? Clearsigning is not a v3 only thing.
=========================
is there a v4 definition of clearsigning that allows subpackets?
...atom
_________________________________________
PGP key - http://atom.smasher.org/pgp.txt
3EBE 2810 30AE 601D 54B2 4A90 9C28 0BBF 3D7D 41E3
-------------------------------------------------
"Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet deprecate
agitation, are men who want rain without thunder and
lightning. They want the ocean without the roar of
its many waters."
-- Frederick Douglass
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: What is this gibberish? - http://atom.smasher.org/links/#digital_signatures
iD8DBQFAdu0AnCgLvz19QeMRAo1kAJ9b9NuTvCNacDjYPcZJQiIAvhzDowCeJVJr
SdcQ2TH3lNzcxYnbT/2xmqY=
=N092
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list