notation data & policy URL

David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com
Sat Apr 10 13:09:16 CEST 2004


On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 03:15:33AM -0400, Atom 'Smasher' wrote:

> it places the notation and URL on both the signing key and the encryption
> sub-key:
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> $ gpg --list-key --show-policy --show-notation 2A42B922
> pub  1024D/2A42B922 2004-04-10 testing <testing at abc.xyz>
> sig 3   PN  2A42B922 2004-04-10   testing <testing at abc.xyz>
>    Signature policy: http://test-policy
>    Signature notation: A at B=test notation
> sub  1024g/5A5D67E7 2004-04-10
> sig     PN  2A42B922 2004-04-10   testing <testing at abc.xyz>
>    Signature policy: http://test-policy
>    Signature notation: A at B=test notation
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> 
> while i do understand the logic (they ~are~ both certification
> signatures), it seems redundant... shouldn't it be sufficient to only add
> those packets to the signing key?

Nope.  It's dangerous for a program to try and be "smart" and guess
what you really mean.  You asked for a notation in both certs, so you
got it.

Notations are a general-purpose extension mechanism.  To do this, they
need to be usable anywhere a signature is generated.

David



More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list