gpg: can't put a policy URL into v3 (PGP 2.x style) signature

Ivan Boldyrev boldyrev+nospam at
Sat Apr 10 15:05:20 CEST 2004

On 8710 day of my life David Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 02:59:16AM -0400, Atom 'Smasher' wrote:
>> > PGP compatibility.  No version of PGP before 8 can reliably handle v4
>> > signatures.
>> =======================
>> then this looks like a typo in the man page...
>> 	--force-v3-sigs
>> 	--no-force-v3-sigs
>> 		OpenPGP states that an implementation should generate v4 sig-
>> 		natures but PGP versions 5 through 7 only recognize v4 signa-
>> 		tures on key material.  This option forces v3 signatures  for
>> 		signatures  on  data.  Note that this option overrides --ask-
>> 		sig-expire, as v3 signatures cannot  have  expiration  dates.
>> 		--no-force-v3-sigs disables this option.
> Where is the typo?

Ivan Boldyrev

                                                  Is 'morning' a gerund?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 480 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20040410/cd228f01/attachment.bin

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list