openPGP vs x509
Atom 'Smasher'
atom-gpg at suspicious.org
Tue Apr 13 21:32:51 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Rational: some people refuse using PGP-encryption/signing.
=============================
huh??
why would someone prefer to use an x509 based system for email??
...atom
_________________________________________
PGP key - http://atom.smasher.org/pgp.txt
3EBE 2810 30AE 601D 54B2 4A90 9C28 0BBF 3D7D 41E3
-------------------------------------------------
"Nothing will benefit human health and increase
chances for survival of life on Earth as much
as the evolution to a vegetarian diet."
-- Albert Einstein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: What is this gibberish? - http://atom.smasher.org/links/#digital_signatures
iEYEARECAAYFAkB8QGcACgkQnCgLvz19QeOKWwCePdS1+ewjO4Op6JU6ZICyNrnq
BzgAn0ggkXH/XuUAWw7J4NsFDkS4W97E
=wOYA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list