openPGP vs x509

Atom 'Smasher' atom-gpg at suspicious.org
Tue Apr 13 21:32:51 CEST 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Rational: some people refuse using PGP-encryption/signing.
=============================

huh??

why would someone prefer to use an x509 based system for email??


	...atom

 _________________________________________
 PGP key - http://atom.smasher.org/pgp.txt
 3EBE 2810 30AE 601D 54B2 4A90 9C28 0BBF 3D7D 41E3
 -------------------------------------------------

	"Nothing will benefit human health and increase
	 chances for survival of life on Earth as much
	 as the evolution to a vegetarian diet."
		-- Albert Einstein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: What is this gibberish?  -  http://atom.smasher.org/links/#digital_signatures

iEYEARECAAYFAkB8QGcACgkQnCgLvz19QeOKWwCePdS1+ewjO4Op6JU6ZICyNrnq
BzgAn0ggkXH/XuUAWw7J4NsFDkS4W97E
=wOYA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list