pgp/mime vs in-line pgp
Stewart V. Wright
svwright+lists at amtp.liv.ac.uk
Wed Apr 14 13:42:14 CEST 2004
* Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder at fortytwo.ch> [040414 12:33]:
> On Wednesday 14 April 2004 13.06, Johannes Posel wrote:
> > Well, one thing that tends to be forgotten is that PGP/MIME
> > absolutely reliably breaks list footers ;-)
> Not on this list (and any other recent mailman installation - dunno
> about other mlms.)
It's not even that simple. I'm on both this list (obviously) and the
GnuCash lists. What surprises me is that both use Mailman v2.1.4,
I sign my messages the same way on both lists and yet my messages to
the GnuCash list don't seem to be verified in an acceptable way (to
Mutt). The _signed_ part of the message is verified OK, it is just
that the signed message plus footer returns a failed check. Where as
on this list everything works fine!
> Or is this a display problem with some mailers? kmail just displays the
> mailman additional part like it is supposed to be.
Mutt shows the whole message so there is no problem there, it is
something screwy in the way Mailman is set up (I guess...).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 274 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20040414/b93fc22c/attachment.bin
More information about the Gnupg-users