ingo.kloecker at epost.de
Fri Feb 6 00:14:18 CET 2004
On Thursday 05 February 2004 22:32, Atom 'Smasher' wrote:
> > > the body of an email should really only contain plain-old ascii.
> > Err. No. I cannot even write the names of several people I know
> > just using plain ascii. Neither can I write all the words I use in
> > day to day e-mail just using plain ascii. It might work for the
> > english speaking folks out there, who aren't from
> > german/swedish/whatever ancestry, but other languages *depend* on
> > characters which cannot be found in the ascii charset.
> > And for these people inline signing *does* break extremely quickly.
> > Just sharing my â¬ 0.02,
> that said, i do apologize for assuming that everyone uses the same
> keyboard as i do. i thought that email is only supposed to be 7-bit,
> and i never thought about compatibility issues when using OpenPGP
> with 8-bit text.... are there problems with that? how so?
That's very funny because your own reply answers this question. See
above. In your reply Ralph's Euro symbol (€) has been converted to
something really strange (because obviously your pine wasn't able to
decode the utf-8 encoded symbol correctly). This misinterpretation
could easily have broken an inline signature. Luckily Ralph used a
PGP/MIME signature. This way the message is first encoded (== converted
from 8-bit to 7-bit) and then the encoded 7-bit text is signed
preventing any problems that might be caused by misinterpreted 8-bit
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20040206/4c38706c/attachment.bin
More information about the Gnupg-users