debianuser@brown.edu

[Charly Avital]

At 4:15 PM +0100 1/22/04, Mark Kirchner wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Thursday, January 22, 2004, 3:06:33 PM, Scott wrote:
>> The rules for filtering spam were probably written by someone who thinks
>> Debian is an 'all natural' V-!- at -G-R-@ substitute.   
>
>Hmm, I don't think so. :-)
>
>The X-Spam-Status Line says:
>| X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.2 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_MULTIPLE_RBL,
>|         RCVD_IN_NJABL,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.62
>
>The successful tests (RCVD_IN_MULTIPLE_RBL, RCVD_IN_NJABL,
>RCVD_IN_SORBS) seem to indicate that the sending host (or some other
>host host in the "Received:"-lines of the mail) has entries in several
>(anti-spam-)blacklists.
>Well, at least, I hope I'm not totally off with this explanation...
>
>Regards,
>Mark Kirchner
[...]


Mark,

you are certainly not off.
It has nothing to do with debianuser.


See: <http://www.us.sorbs.net/>

Charly