shavital at netbox.com
Thu Jan 22 18:50:29 CET 2004
At 4:15 PM +0100 1/22/04, Mark Kirchner wrote:
>On Thursday, January 22, 2004, 3:06:33 PM, Scott wrote:
>> The rules for filtering spam were probably written by someone who thinks
>> Debian is an 'all natural' V-!- at -G-R-@ substitute.
>Hmm, I don't think so. :-)
>The X-Spam-Status Line says:
>| X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.2 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_MULTIPLE_RBL,
>| RCVD_IN_NJABL,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.62
>The successful tests (RCVD_IN_MULTIPLE_RBL, RCVD_IN_NJABL,
>RCVD_IN_SORBS) seem to indicate that the sending host (or some other
>host host in the "Received:"-lines of the mail) has entries in several
>Well, at least, I hope I'm not totally off with this explanation...
you are certainly not off.
It has nothing to do with debianuser.
More information about the Gnupg-users