Detection of sign-only vs. sign-and-encrypt keys
Stoyan Dimitrov
stoyan at adiumdesign.com
Wed Jun 23 08:49:34 CEST 2004
As far as I can remember in man pages there's no such thinkg like
encrypting RSA keys. And generating of keys of that type is "certain
potentially incompatible"
(http://annys.eines.info/cgi-bin/man/man2html?1+gpg). So in general it
is not needed to distinguish RSA keytypes.
Atom 'Smasher' wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Stoyan Dimitrov wrote:
>
>>> when you type:
>>> gpg --list-keys
>>> look in the input after the type of the key (pub|sup) is the length of
>>> the key folowed by a single letter (for example '1024g') this letter
>>> tells you what is the what kind exactly is the key.
>>> read this: http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html#AEN244
>
> ===================
>
> that alone won't distinguish a sign-only RSA key, an encrypt-only RSA
> key or a sign+encrypt RSA key.... in all cases the key type is "R".
>
>
> ...atom
>
> _________________________________________
> PGP key - http://atom.smasher.org/pgp.txt
> 762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> "Like many big companies, Microsoft wins by dominating
> distribution channels, not by having better products.
> Having a technical edge over competitors is not
> critical to their business."
> -- Paul Graham
--
_________________
Best Regards,
Stoyan Dimitrov
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list