Detection of sign-only vs. sign-and-encrypt keys

Atom 'Smasher' atom at suspicious.org
Wed Jun 23 09:01:56 CEST 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Stoyan Dimitrov wrote:

> As far as I can remember in man pages there's no such thinkg like encrypting 
> RSA keys. And generating of keys of that type is "certain potentially 
> incompatible" (http://annys.eines.info/cgi-bin/man/man2html?1+gpg). So in 
> general it is not needed to distinguish RSA keytypes.
======================

i'm not sure about the man page, but gpg *does* handle RSA keys in 
sign-only, encrypt-only and sign+encrypt variations.

in the output from --list-keys, all of them are noted as "R".

actually... AFAIK, the RSA keys are technically the same for all 3 of the 
different uses; only the flags on the key specify how it is to be used.


 	...atom

  _________________________________________
  PGP key - http://atom.smasher.org/pgp.txt
  762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
  -------------------------------------------------

 	"Never forget that everything Hitler did
 	 in Germany was legal."
 		-- Martin Luther King, Jr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: What is this gibberish?
Comment: http://atom.smasher.org/links/#digital_signatures

iEYEARECAAYFAkDZKusACgkQnCgLvz19QeObTACfXMB9+oRTpnLJSudfRT6ZsnRP
y9MAmwU/bx1eA2GfefLOExaYl6oxQGnE
=AAX/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list