Detection of sign-only vs. sign-and-encrypt keys
Atom 'Smasher'
atom at suspicious.org
Wed Jun 23 09:01:56 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Stoyan Dimitrov wrote:
> As far as I can remember in man pages there's no such thinkg like encrypting
> RSA keys. And generating of keys of that type is "certain potentially
> incompatible" (http://annys.eines.info/cgi-bin/man/man2html?1+gpg). So in
> general it is not needed to distinguish RSA keytypes.
======================
i'm not sure about the man page, but gpg *does* handle RSA keys in
sign-only, encrypt-only and sign+encrypt variations.
in the output from --list-keys, all of them are noted as "R".
actually... AFAIK, the RSA keys are technically the same for all 3 of the
different uses; only the flags on the key specify how it is to be used.
...atom
_________________________________________
PGP key - http://atom.smasher.org/pgp.txt
762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
-------------------------------------------------
"Never forget that everything Hitler did
in Germany was legal."
-- Martin Luther King, Jr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: What is this gibberish?
Comment: http://atom.smasher.org/links/#digital_signatures
iEYEARECAAYFAkDZKusACgkQnCgLvz19QeObTACfXMB9+oRTpnLJSudfRT6ZsnRP
y9MAmwU/bx1eA2GfefLOExaYl6oxQGnE
=AAX/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list