jharris at widomaker.com
Mon Jun 28 01:22:15 CEST 2004
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 11:58:49PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Was anyone else able to verify Stoyan's message on the list (Re: Detection of
> sign-only vs. sign-and-encrypt keys) Yesterday 1:12:04 and again today?
> I use Debian unstable, GnuPG 1.2.4 and --auto-key-retrieve and
> --include-subkeys with keyserver.kjsl.com but the subkey is not found, even
> though the main key is imported seemingly successfully.
> The subkey shows up on the search results page using a www interface, but it
> is not imported.
> gpg: Signature made Sat Jun 26 07:59:42 2004 BST using DSA key ID 1E3D95C3
> gpg: key B8D71FB6: "Stoyan Dimitrov " not changed
> gpg: Total number processed: 1
> gpg: unchanged: 1
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
On subkeys.pgp.net, the signature for the signing subkey still isn't available.
It wasn't on biglumber.com as of yesterday either, but it is now:
%uuencode 000014-002.sig < 000014-002.sig
begin 644 000014-002.sig
Jason Harris | NIC: JH329, PGP: This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it?
jharris at widomaker.com _|_ web: http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/
Got photons? (TM), (C) 2004
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20040627/a16712e8/attachment.bin
More information about the Gnupg-users