w32 installation paths

[C. D. Rok]

vedaal at hush.com wrote:

>>From what I know, 2.6.3ia-multi06 would be the version of choice.
>>[2.6]' "...cryptographic security has been in doubt for some time now..." 


> much as i love 2.6.3a multi 6,
> and am one of the few diehards that still uses it regularly
> (and from a floppy),
> 
> i would _not_ recommend it for use in
> 'really nasty places'...
> no crypto program is useful there,
 > as a simple screen capturer or hardware key logger is enough
 > to cause major tragedy
...

Of course. (I just re-used the expression from a previous post).
Let me thus rephrase:

Is there any reason to believe that with the right choice of
cipher and key length 2.6.3a multi 6 would be cryptographically
less secure than the current PGPG's?


CR