Are gpg signatures considered attachments?

[Chris]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 25 December 2005 11:54 am, Thorsten Haude wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Chris wrote (2005-12-25 17:22):
> >I know that is probably a lame question, however, I'm on several mailing
> >lists that are bouncing my messages back to me because they are signed.
> > The list owners are telling me this is because they don't allow
> > attachments.
>
> Mutt adds a 'Content-Disposition: inline' to the MIME part containing
> the signature. This seems to work, I don't remember any bouncing
> mails. (Pipermail has a problem with signed attachments though.)
>
>
> Thorsten

Thanks Thorsten. It was pointed out to me that my signatures had been added 
as attachments which was causing the bounces.  When I changed to 'inline' 
the problem went away. Kmail however shows 'Inline OpenPGP (deprecated)' 
not exactly why it shows that, but its the option I'm now using.

Thanks

- -- 
Chris
Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org
13:20:00 up 6 days, 15:15, 1 user, load average: 0.65, 0.41, 0.37
Mandriva Linux 10.1 Official, kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDrvMK43Kn2pjmcFwRAt6kAJ9J2g+qjIkZHIPgdBl4u2wxrup07QCcD2U2
E+s/L1rB7watA0StdLO2vSA=
=OL3B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----