Are gpg signatures considered attachments?
cpollock at earthlink.net
Wed Dec 28 00:45:21 CET 2005
On Tuesday 27 December 2005 4:51 am, Thorsten Haude wrote:
> * Chris wrote (2005-12-27 03:30):
> >On the Mandriva Newibe list signatures using OpenPGP/MIME show up as
> >bad while those using Inline OpenPGP show up as good.
> They show up as good where? Are the Mails coming back from the list
> not verifyable? Is there some kind of status attached?
They make it to the list, however, they show up this way using OpenPGP/MIME:
Message was signed by cpollock at earthlink.net (Key ID: 0xE372A7DA98E6705C).
Warning: The signature is bad.
On the bad signature I see this when looking at the msg source:
On a good signature I see this:
Its even gotten so messed up that some have their signatures show bad when
adding a sig to the bottom of the message, leaving it off shows the
signature as valid. The opinion on the list is that something is
definately out of whack in the list software configuration.
Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org
17:37:19 up 24 min, 1 user, load average: 0.24, 0.22, 0.35
Mandriva Linux 10.1 Official, kernel 22.214.171.124-12mdk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20051227/6a0cee9e/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the Gnupg-users