david69 at charter.net
Fri Feb 4 08:17:46 CET 2005
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:24:39AM -0500, Atom Smasher wrote:
> gpg 1.4 is better. no comment on RH9.
I will upgrade to 1.4.
> why not update the expiration date on the subkeys, and keep them? if
> they're not compromised there's no reason to throw them away.
It may be a good practice if GPG/PGP can automatically consider them as valid
since they are signed with the master key.
> RSA support is optional in rfc2440. i've been using an RSA only key for a
> while with no problems, mostly with other gpg users.
Can PGP 5+ handle this kind of key (master RSA + 2 RSA sub-keys)?
Thanks for your help,
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in
practice, there is."
- Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut -
More information about the Gnupg-users