GnuPG Clearsign vs. PGP/MIME Signing
sk at intertivity.com
Sat Jun 4 15:35:47 CEST 2005
No, i think sean is also false.
The last mail form ivan boldyrev is encoded right!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Mundy [mailto:harob02 at earthlink.net]
> Sent: Samstag, 4. Juni 2005 14:21
> To: sk at intertivity.com
> Cc: gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> Subject: Re: GnuPG Clearsign vs. PGP/MIME Signing
> Kiefer, Sascha wrote:
> >I just implemented RFC2015 3 days ago.
> >The format of PGP/MIME described in that paper does not match the
> >format you are using. Your mails start with a Content-Type of
> >multipart/mixed and you declare The pgp data as attachments.
> But this
> >is not true. Maybe I'm missing something, or your messages not
> >pgp/smime encoded? I attached your mails (one signed, one
> encrypted) to
> >this mail, so you can check to see what i mean.
> yeah, i noticed that sean didn't have any attachments, even
> though enigmail recognized his signature alright. that's
> kind of strange.
More information about the Gnupg-users