GnuPG Clearsign vs. PGP/MIME Signing

Kiefer, Sascha sk at
Sat Jun 4 15:35:47 CEST 2005

No, i think sean is also false.
The last mail form ivan boldyrev is encoded right!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Mundy [mailto:harob02 at] 
> Sent: Samstag, 4. Juni 2005 14:21
> To: sk at
> Cc: gnupg-users at
> Subject: Re: GnuPG Clearsign vs. PGP/MIME Signing
> Kiefer, Sascha wrote:
> >Hmm.
> >I just implemented RFC2015 3 days ago.
> >The format of PGP/MIME described in that paper does not match the 
> >format you are using. Your mails start with a Content-Type of 
> >multipart/mixed and you declare The pgp data as attachments. 
> But this 
> >is not true. Maybe I'm missing something, or your messages not 
> >pgp/smime encoded? I attached your mails (one signed, one 
> encrypted) to 
> >this mail, so you can check to see what i mean.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Sascha
> >  
> >
> yeah, i noticed that sean didn't have any attachments, even 
> though enigmail recognized his signature alright.  that's 
> kind of strange.

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list