GnuPG Clearsign vs. PGP/MIME Signing

David Shaw dshaw at
Sun Jun 5 01:01:27 CEST 2005

On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 10:42:51AM +0200, Kiefer, Sascha wrote:
> Hmm.
> I just implemented RFC2015 3 days ago.
> The format of PGP/MIME described in that paper does not match the format
> you are using.
> Your mails start with a Content-Type of multipart/mixed and you declare
> The pgp data as attachments. But this is not true.
> Maybe I'm missing something, or your messages not pgp/smime encoded?
> I attached your mails (one signed, one encrypted) to this mail,
> so you can check to see what i mean.

Possibly the confusion is that RFC-2015 was updated by RFC-3156.  You
should do things the 3156 way.


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list