gpgme-1.1.0: make check: FAIL: t-sig-notation
Marcus Brinkmann
marcus.brinkmann at ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Fri Oct 7 01:03:29 CEST 2005
At Thu, 06 Oct 2005 20:29:04 +0000,
"William M. Perkins" <wmp at grnwood.net> wrote:
> GnuPG version: 1.4.2, min. 1.2.2
Ah, ok. I only tested it with GnuPG 1.4.1, which worked fine.
> The failure happened at:
> t-sig-notation.c:108: Missing or duplicate notation data
> FAIL: t-sig-notation
GnuPG 1.4.2 has a stricter check for critical notation data. Sigh.
The below patch is now in CVS Head, and will be part of 1.1.1. If you
want, give it a try. Otherwise just ignore the broken test, it has no
effect on how GPGME works.
2005-10-07 Marcus Brinkmann <marcus at g10code.de>
* gpg/t-sig-notation.c: Change critical notation to something
GnuPG understands.
diff -ru gpgme/tests/gpg/t-sig-notation.c gpgme/tests/gpg/t-sig-notation.c
--- gpgme/tests/gpg/t-sig-notation.c 2005-10-01 04:06:08.000000000 +0200
+++ gpgme/tests/gpg/t-sig-notation.c 2005-10-07 01:00:02.000000000 +0200
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@
{ "laughing at me",
"Just Squeeze Me",
GPGME_SIG_NOTATION_HUMAN_READABLE },
- { "leave at home",
- "Right Now",
+ { "preferred-email-encoding at pgp.com",
+ "pgpmime",
GPGME_SIG_NOTATION_HUMAN_READABLE | GPGME_SIG_NOTATION_CRITICAL },
{ NULL,
"http://www.gnu.org/policy/",
Thanks,
Marcus
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list