Multiple signing - is this a common desire? (was Re: Signing
MS-Excel spread sheets)
Kiefer, Sascha
sk at intertivity.com
Mon Sep 5 19:15:47 CEST 2005
Well, i do not know about files, but our product signs mails using
multiple-signatures (at least two signatures are required before a mail
leaves the system).
So i think it is NOT a bad feature.
Regards,
Sascha
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gnupg-users-bounces at gnupg.org
> [mailto:gnupg-users-bounces at gnupg.org] On Behalf Of Kurt Fitzner
> Sent: Montag, 5. September 2005 01:21
> To: gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> Subject: Multiple signing - is this a common desire? (was Re:
> Signing MS-Excel spread sheets)
>
>
>
> Berend Tober wrote:
>
> > Anyway, I've looked at WinPT and GPGee and one other GUI wrapper
> > around gnupg, but they all of course are victims of this MS Excel
> > "feature", and furthermore none of them satisfy my other need to be
> > able to support multiple persons signing any given document
>
>
> When I started with GPGee I debated the idea of handling
> multiple-signatures. I decided not to deal with the added
> complexity because I didn't think it was a much called-for feature.
>
> If this is something that people would want to do more often
> in the real world, I'll happily add this feature.
>
> I can even drop in something like "Set target file read-only
> after operation" - well, if I can figure out a shorter
> description to use for it.
>
> Anyway, is multiple-key signing more common than I gave it credit for?
>
> Kurt.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list