This IS about GD - a proposal on dealing with the problem

Pawel Shajdo zwon at
Sat Sep 10 22:28:57 CEST 2005

On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:00:38PM -0600, Kurt Fitzner wrote:
> Ok, that other thread isn't about the GD, but this one is.  I think this
> is something that should be discussed and a consensus reached.
> Are they a good/bad signer?
> Does something need to be done about them?
> Should they be approached by the community?
> ...
> Signature cleaning and/or filtering is not the answer, just as spam
> filtering is not the ultimate answer.  The cost to the IT industry of
> spam filtering is enormous.  Let's deal with the problem at the source.
> 	Kurt.
I think this is public more keyservers design problem than GD. Keyserver
should accept new signatures only from key owner.

   Pawel I. Shajdo

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list