Why are my signatures being labelled as bad?
samuel at Update.UU.SE
Fri Apr 21 11:23:29 CEST 2006
I would guess that by "signed" you mean clear-signed.
Are you using Mime or in-line signatures?
Clear-signed, esp in-line, messages can suffer from email clients and
MTA's that make "corrections" like changing character encoding or
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:47:02PM -0700, Robert Smits wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out why I can send encrypted messages to myself at home
> from my work computer, and they come through just fine, but signed messages
> to myself from my work computer come labeelled as having a bad signature.
> Work computer - Suse Linux 9.3 running Kmail and KGpg. Have identity set to
> sign and encrypt with same GPG keys. Exported public address to home
> Home computer Compaq laptop running Suse 10.0, also with Kmail and KGpg.
> Imported public key from work, set it as trusted.
> Signed files from work arrive at home with "bad" signatures. Encrypted files
> from work arrive at home and decrypt just fine.
> Signed files and encrypted files from home arrive at work just fine. Can
> anyone point me in the correct direction?
> Robert Smits Exec Ass't Ph 753-0201 Fax 753-2954 Email labour at telus.net
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
More information about the Gnupg-users