Why are my signatures being labelled as bad?

[Samuel ]slund]

Hi Robert,

I would guess that by "signed" you mean clear-signed.
Are you using Mime or in-line signatures?
Clear-signed, esp in-line, messages can suffer from email clients and 
MTA's that make "corrections" like changing character encoding or 
wrapping lines. 

HTH
//Samuel

On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:47:02PM -0700, Robert Smits wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out why I can send encrypted messages to myself at home 
> from my work computer, and they come through just fine, but signed messages 
> to myself from my work computer come labeelled as having a bad signature.
> 
> Work computer - Suse Linux 9.3 running Kmail and KGpg. Have identity set to 
> sign and encrypt with same GPG keys. Exported public address to home 
> computer.
> 
> Home computer Compaq laptop running Suse 10.0, also with Kmail and KGpg. 
> Imported public key from work, set it as trusted. 
> 
> Signed files from work arrive at home with "bad" signatures. Encrypted files 
> from work arrive at home and decrypt just fine. 
> 
> Signed files and encrypted files from home arrive at work just fine. Can 
> anyone point me in the correct direction?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -- 
> Robert Smits Exec Ass't Ph 753-0201 Fax 753-2954 Email labour at telus.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users