gpg error messag

Jim Dever jdever at
Mon Nov 6 18:05:44 CET 2006

David Shaw wrote:

> Ah, I recall this problem.  I reported it to the PGP GD people quite a
> while ago, and I thought it had been fixed.  The GD was generating a
> PGP/MIME micalg setting of pgp-sha1, but the actual signature was
> being made with SHA256.

Found it.  That's exactly what's happening and obviously the problem
still hasn't been fixed (or else it raised its ugly head again).

Content-type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary=PGP_Universal_2F4EB16A_4F41CA65_EABA882D_FCFE19A6

Thanks to you both!


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list