gpg error messag
jdever at triad.rr.com
Mon Nov 6 18:05:44 CET 2006
David Shaw wrote:
> Ah, I recall this problem. I reported it to the PGP GD people quite a
> while ago, and I thought it had been fixed. The GD was generating a
> PGP/MIME micalg setting of pgp-sha1, but the actual signature was
> being made with SHA256.
Found it. That's exactly what's happening and obviously the problem
still hasn't been fixed (or else it raised its ugly head again).
Content-type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
Thanks to you both!
More information about the Gnupg-users