comment and version fields.
sven at radde.name
Mon Apr 2 10:19:25 CEST 2007
randux at Safe-mail.net schrieb:
> The "comment" and "version" armor fields are both essentially
> comments, and are ignored by the OpenPGP protocol. You can change
> either of them to whatever you like.
> ... That seems to defeat the reason for signing
> as the common person would assume that a signed message
> is protected entirely against unauthorised changes.
I agree with randux here. The Comment is within the "---PGP
SIGNATURE---" part and I, too, was not aware that it is not protected by
anything. (Do the docs mention this, btw?)
It might be a possible way for a social engineering attack, if comments
like the following were inserted:
"Comment: NOTE: I will retire my current key soon!"
"Comment: Obtain my new key from http://evil.impersonator.net/sven.asc"
"Comment: Fingerprint of new key: [...]"
It may not be a big risk, but I doubt that the general user-base is
aware of the fact that comments are not signed parts of the message.
I would suggest to at least update the documentation :-)
More information about the Gnupg-users