GPG 1.4.x v.s 2.x
Alan Olsen
aolsen at standard.com
Tue Dec 18 19:51:47 CET 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
The place I work needs to upgrade gpg badly. They know this. The question is do they go with the 1.4.x tree or should they go to the 2.x codebase?
Suggestions? Recommendations?
We get files from clients all over the world. Are there features used in the 2.x versions that 1.4.x cannot handle?
Thanks.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 9.5.3 (Build 5003)
wsBVAwUBR2gWw2qdmbpu7ejzAQpaDwf7B8HQHiC+JY4yzfU6nB9RDuGT9LwqQ8FU
0iFCdYTHscqyUyUg92A2kf5CUT1Cv+QRthQELa9AXSJvBoCa43cn19h4bbQfGNC2
SXBJFH9vvSQ1KHcnndimlvaRtoyyUqcjij5VRZvrWPoLi4dlP5qXCE9JM3TO3X3W
F+J2CzTu5BTXEZ3bhkjjIcgevrJNoRdRY9cnpzWHOJcBkpn352OdiO77GEZYXF5d
+kZ1k6JdIkNtOBZPGxYvpnVHLDXa3wxDRV5rg52qUAAKVLH6VmaZt+l4R/3P5t0L
hBwJ95mh92Dv7zQ/ysDsTdpFhVl1yROSBVSCPA4HR8XL5UPzyEEa6g==
=Lbp4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list