Need Help

John Clizbe JPClizbe at
Wed Apr 16 07:11:40 CEST 2008

Sven Radde wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 15.04.2008, 11:03 -0500 schrieb John Clizbe:
>> There is nothing to backport.  David Shaw answered this exact same post last
>> Friday on both GnuPG-Users and GnuPG-Devel.
> I felt already last Friday that this was only a partial answer to the
> question.
> Although it might not be necessary to backport 1.4.9's changes to 1.4.7,
> nobody can guarantee that there won't be a 1.4.10 that fixes a
> vulnerability which exists since 1.4.7.
> It might be worth to solve the issue of possible backports now, when -
> as you rightly state - there is no need for immediate action.

Excellent! So we'll look to you to be submitting patch sets then?

John P. Clizbe                   Inet:   JPClizbe (a) tx DAWT rr DAHT con
Ginger Bear Networks             hkp://
"Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter
and those who matter don't mind." - Dr Seuss, "Oh the Places You'll Go"

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 654 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20080416/f335d360/attachment-0001.pgp>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list