Need recommendation on keyserver code

[Alan Olsen]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512


Todd Zullinger wrote:

>Alan Olsen wrote:
>> 5) Eventually I want to package at least one keyserver for Fedora.

>IIRC from when I built SKS on Fedora 8, the main issue was updating the code to the newer
>Berkely DB.  I didn't test it all that much after building it though -- it just wasn't 
>that interesting.

>I'll attach the patches I used to get it to build.  They may help you get a working
> package.  I make no guarantees that these are correct, as I'm far from intelligent in 
> the ways of bdb.

Those patches do not fix my build problems.  (It is running out of memory compiling numerix.ml.)  Your patches are also for a much earlier version of numerix.

I have sent mail to the SKS author to see if he has any ideas.

>Onak might end up being easier to build.  I never played with it though.

Compiled with no problems.  (The bzr version took a bit more.  Had to page in the memories of how autoconf developer builds work.)

I have not tested Onak yet.  I have a keyserver dump I am going to load into it and see what happens.

Thanks!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 9.5.3 (Build 5003)

wsBVAwUBSCNCiGqdmbpu7ejzAQoNlAf+K2MP37bnG1B0hlAJTz3NGu+z25F/I/hq
VRgnTawRGcAgBi85hAD5Vp5k07jqVsdSKrpWWCey19h4LBlI9AWxyEirqFcyxzl9
UEPtZRRrU/99jq6iZg/T39m2vQGrA7Fwhb5MIuR+Di+pWvOBIyOwPsJdSbqCOYT4
bVhzvOILeE0B1lN6XG99VkNefFqUik8Pg9ggcJqT6I9CjskjNRPtt3ntSsXvw3pP
htIBINz8IyDn4yCzGD/Xn/4GuW2XoEeuWWk7pwy2a/ed6C+s0Cfo8RT7F0zxOUsi
fSCLRq1N7wLpVpb+Y4YYHrhGTeLwEkzkqbfLEivG7ROCiT9wXHHLCw==
=hMxf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----