reynt0 at cs.albany.edu
Tue Nov 4 22:15:22 CET 2008
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
. . .
> Right, and this much doesn't bother me. It's when people start ascribing
> meaning to bad signatures, or the nonexistence of signatures, that I begin to
> get frustrated. A bad signature doesn't mean the message was tampered with
> -- the alteration could have been in the signature and not the message
> itself, just to name one possibility.
. . .
In a single word, be "prudent".
More information about the Gnupg-users