Signature semantics

Michel Messerschmidt lists at
Wed Nov 5 22:22:04 CET 2008

On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 12:04:19PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> Indeed.  The alteration also may or may not be malicious.  The most
> common alteration I've ever seen are mail programs that break the
> signature via word-wrap or the like.  (Hence the frequent "Does my
> signature verify now?" message chains on some crypto mailing lists).

The most common signature invalidation I've seen is the addition of 
corporate disclaimers to every outgoing and incoming message on the 
server :(


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list