Bad signatures on Gmail messages
John W. Moore III
jmoore3rd at bellsouth.net
Fri Apr 24 05:15:41 CEST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Brian Mearns wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org> wrote:
>> That is why PGP/MIME is the only robust format and higly recommended
>> over of the simple clearsigning mode.
> Could you elaborate on this Werner? I'm not familiar with this...does
> gpg support this?
GPG supports PGP/MIME without any trouble; but not all MUA's can handle
PGP/MIME. Most notably, all of the MUA's distributed by M$. :-\
However, when used with a Frontend such as GPGrelay PGP/MIME is easily
accomplished using even Outlook, Outlook Express or Windows Mail.
JOHN ;)
Timestamp: Thursday 23 Apr 2009, 23:15 --400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10-svn4987: (MingW32)
Comment: Public Key at: http://tinyurl.com/8cpho
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: https://www.gswot.org
Comment: Homepage: http://tinyurl.com/yzhbhx
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJJ8S7aAAoJEBCGy9eAtCsPyDAH/3/bQ8fum/15CT9Nt2RxMhj+
d0izoEFkXBnf8tfNVm3OLPfQVo8tv+fhYhMAUkNWwt1iLmEOGIZCPeEjy0F6bJ7t
Qo+ORKrhJjhUc3+IHJWECxNStQlKjzpTJsCY5nNbslnoy50LnitkOV3QC2/Xl8qF
U4w0fK9N6tbQfpJD9fLCZC0ED7mbeMqw7LXLnrQQNO9T/ADg+X62Rpu9lYGQ72bT
Rh406LCAmDZ/qugY2TtV+Wgn04ycQxxnveqw4sI3+AvdGP9LnlU/qR585BMj3Hqj
H8ZnLU0r1qV75nPtjk9NCXpbyZeinIBun1M5yIZMjP9bhd/LvTMPZqV8ESJF6po=
=ERy6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list