paperkey // ? feature request

Sven Radde email at
Tue Feb 10 19:27:44 CET 2009


David Shaw schrieb:
> If you can't remove the redundant parts, then you're basically storing
> a secret key, unchanged.

Apart from the encoding and line-wise checksums which paperkey adds,
that is...

Maybe this posting from a thread when I asked to extend paperkey for use
with revocation certificates is also useful for Vedaal:

It seems like your nice tool has a greater potential than initially
conceived ;-)

cu, Sven

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list