paperkey // ? feature request

[Sven Radde]

Hi!

David Shaw schrieb:
> If you can't remove the redundant parts, then you're basically storing
> a secret key, unchanged.


Apart from the encoding and line-wise checksums which paperkey adds,
that is...

Maybe this posting from a thread when I asked to extend paperkey for use
with revocation certificates is also useful for Vedaal:
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2008-October/034741.html

It seems like your nice tool has a greater potential than initially
conceived ;-)

cu, Sven