Gnupg good for big groups?
expires2010 at ymail.com
Mon Aug 9 19:48:43 CEST 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sunday 8 August 2010 at 5:44:21 PM, in
<mid:4C5EDEE5.1060304 at sixdemonbag.org>, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Right, but at that point you're coming close to
> cherrypicking -- disregarding data points in order to
> reach a result that's more in line with your
> preconceptions. Nobody ever wakes up and says, "today
> I think I'll cherrypick." It's almost always a
> subconscious process: "well, I can disregard that data,
> it's clearly anomalous because..."
I worded that very badly. Rather than throwing away data, I was trying
to suggest looking at it in more detail. As a whole from day 1 to day
n, the proportion not encrypted to the key was x. Fine as far as it
goes, but did the figures confirm or refute my expectation that the
proportion would be higher in the first few days and then decline to a
MFPA mailto:expires2010 at ymail.com
Was time invented by an Irishman named O'Clock?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-users