Robert J. Hansen
rjh at sixdemonbag.org
Sun Dec 12 21:51:10 CET 2010
On 12/12/2010 3:03 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> what do you mean by "V4 certificate checksums"?
Read the RFC. It's in there, and does a better job than I can do of
explaining it. Section 5.5.3.
> yeah, this is serious, but it's not embedded in the certificate. if we
> were to come up with a new fingerprint format, it would not invalidate
> any existing certificates -- it would just change how we refer to them.
I am very skeptical of this claim you seem to be making, that we can
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 5598 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Gnupg-users